Open Radar

 
Summary:
Swift documentation encourages to declare protocol conformance using extensions, but implementation of more sophisticated protocols sometimes requires a presence of stored properties.

In Objective-C, I would divide my implementation into chunks using the "class extension" concept, as long as they're in the same source file as the main implementation:

    @interface Foo ()
    @property NSString *baz;
    @end

In Swift, however, this is not possible:

    extension Foo {
        var baz: String?
    }

Allowing this would be a very welcome addition, even with restrictions (i.e. this kind of extension would have to be declared within the same target).

Steps to Reproduce:
n/a

Expected Results:
n/a

Actual Results:
n/a

Version:
Feature is not yet available as of Xcode 6.0 Beta 6 (6A280e)

Notes:
n/a

Configuration:
n/a

Attachments:

--- 23-Aug-2014 01:08 AM / ADR

Engineering has determined that your bug report is a duplicate of another issue and will be closed.

11437733